Monday, 26 November 2018

Week 32 (Final Week) - Key Change in Professional Practice

Week 32 - Key Change in Professional Practice


I will be using Rolfe et al.’s (2001) reflective model

Step 1 (What):
Wow...is this journey really nearing the end?
On Monday 26 February I went along to a MindLab pop-up class at Mana College and signed my name to
take on the challenge of doing a postgrad paper and working full time...call me crazy any day, for it has not
been an easy one but, I would do it all over again to gain the knowledge I have now.
How has my practice changed?   The change that I feel has really challenged me would be ‘Professional
Relationships - Establish and maintain professional relationships and behaviours focused on the learning
and wellbeing of each learner (Our Code, Our Standards, 2017).

Step 2 (Now what):
I will be using the Cycle of Experiential Learning model Osterman and Kottkamp (2015, p.70) to reflect on
my changes.

Stage 1: Problem identification
I started with a new year level this year and I was determined to read up and learn as much as could to
teach my new learners.  Results from their PAT test in term 1 were very low and so this is where the change
of practice occured. I set goals up so that I had a time frame to work within to test the different approaches
I was going to use in my class.  Also with every start of the year a chance to build relationships with my
tamariki and find out about them. It was important to me to implement the change because I didn’t want
to continue to do the same thing over and over again and the results remained the same.

Stage 2: Observation and analysis
As I mentioned above the PAT data Term 1 came back very low.  For some of my tamariki it confirmed
observations I had taken and for others I thought they could have scored higher from what I had seen
in their book work and class activities.  The data gave me a starting point of where my tamariki strengths
were and the support they were going to need to become successful learners. I had to also make sure
that I was critically reflecting on my teaching practices such as wait time, clear instructions, my questioning
etc.

Stage 3: Abstract re conceptualization
Durie (2003) talked about key aspects to raising student achievement which is the importance of cultural
identity with a child’s learning.  I was wanting to make students feel more in control of their own learning,
making mistakes and learning from them, but before any of that could happen I had to really get to know
them.  Not just them as my students in class, but also the learner they were outside of class. I had to be
willing to engage and collaborate learning-focused relationship with them, their whanau, my colleagues,
support staff and other outside agencies to support and raise achievement.

Stage 4: Active experimentation
The use of digital devices has now been implemented into my classroom practice.  I had to really be c
areful not to get carried away with all that a device can do, but break down my programme where the
devices were used as a tool to get to what I wanted my learners to achieve.  The change has been a positive f
or all my learners but only half in bring the whanau together and celebrating the success together.

Step 3 (What next)
This was just beginning steps and I will take the wins that my learners gained through the challenges.  
I will also take the hard knocks and work on why it was so difficult to bring about shifts with students
learning, staff collaborative discussions and whanau engagement, which is the area I would like to improve
more on.  I know culture plays a huge part with whanau engagement and I want to break down barriers
that in some cases school put up, without even knowing it. However, this can only work if the whole staff
have the same goal and vision.

Fa’afetai lava MindLab and to my tutors Ben and Rochelle.

References

Durie, M (2003). Ngā Kahui Pou: Launching Māori Futures. Huia Publications.

Osterman, K. F., & Kottkamp, R. B. (2015). Reflective practice for educators : professional development
to improve student learning.(2nd ed.) New York: Skyhorse Publishing.

Ministry of Education (2017). Our code, our standards. Retrieved from

Ministry of Education (2017). The Code of Professional Responsibility.  Retrieved from
https://educationcouncil.org.nz/sites/default/files/Code%20Guidance%20FINAL.pdf

Week 31 - Indigenous Knowledge and Cultural Responsiveness

Week 31 - Indigenous Knowledge and Cultural Responsiveness


I will be using Rolfe et al.’s (2001) reflective model

Step 1 (What):
What is indigenous knowledge and cultural responsiveness? For me, it’s understanding and valuing that
everyone is different in their own unique way due to where they come from, where they have been and what
they believe is important to them.
So how does this look in my practices?  I believe I do learning and activity resources very well to cater for all
the different cultures represented in my classroom.  Working with my families to help me in what resources
I can use or make to support my learners. Starting here allows me to build relationships with parents and
whanau of my learners and create the awareness that their child is valued no matter where they come from.  
My learners see how much their whanau is valued that they feel the same, which leads them to be more open
about themselves, their home life and kura.
Though I have painted a positive picture of what I create in my classroom, it is never as smooth sailing as that.  
It actually takes a lot of work and every situation is different. With some of my families it took up to two-three
terms before a relationship was formed.

Step 2 (So what):
Writing up School Practices, Annual Plans or Charter is one thing, but actually following them is another.  I
believe every school have the right intentions to do what is best for every learner in their care no matter
where they come from or who they are.  This will look different in every school, depending on how they
approach culturally responsive pedagogy.
A few years back the school I was at were celebrating our school inquiry ‘This is me’.  The students did lots of
work on finding out their whakapapa, family and cultural values etc.  To involve the staff, I suggested that we
all dress up in our traditional cultural clothing or anything that identifies who you are. Some staff members
were very upset with the idea for they said they did not have a culture and I had made them feel excluded
from the celebrations.  I apologised that they felt this way for it wasn’t my intention, but I also asked, how
did they teach their learners the value of culture if they said they did not have one?

Step 3 (What next)
The first time I read the ‘Action continuum - eliminating the White spaces’ I could identify exactly where I
thought my school would be, also myself.  So what would be the next steps for my school? Continue to push
cultural responsiveness Milne, A (2017) and request that staff gets professional development in order to
identify our white spaces within our school, classrooms, teaching, staff relationships and relationships with
whanau and community.
Most of our school data identifies Maori learners as well as Pacific Islanders and others.  Yet programmes
within the school don’t change to suit the learners. Reading is still reading and writing is still writing.  I
totally agree with Milne (2017) when she argues that cultural identity is not just a celebration of language
weeks or a poster here and there around the classroom.  
Until schools can truly say that they are inclusive of indigenous knowledge and cultural responsiveness, their
learners no matter what culture they identify with will be successful.

References

CORE Education.(2017, 17 October). Dr Ann Milne, Colouring in the white spaces: Reclaiming cultural identity
in whitestream schools.[video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=5cTvi5qxqp4&
feature=em-subs_digest

Edtalks.(2012, September 23). A culturally responsive pedagogy of relations. [video file].Retrieved from
https://vimeo. com/49992994
  
Milne, B.A. (2013). Colouring in the white spaces: Reclaiming cultural identity in whitestream schools.
(Doctoral Thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand). Retrieved from
http://hdl. handle.net/10289/7868

Saturday, 24 November 2018

Week 30 Contemporary Trends in New Zealand or International

Week 30 - Contemporary Trends in New Zealand or International


Step 1 (What):
My blog week 29 I said I was old school in my way of online approach and now with week 30s topic of
‘Trends’ I believe old school plays an important part in this too. Digital technology is everywhere, whether
it is in our classrooms, homes, work, lifestyles etc, it is part of our everyday lives.  We cannot avoid it and
our tamariki don’t want to stop using it. It is the way forward.
So what impact of digital learning affects me and my practices?  Writer and radio producer
Adizah Eghan (2016) says that a toddler who is read to and has conversations everyday learns around
21,000 words a day.  This would be the same for our young learners using digital devices at an early age
and how confident they become being able to navigate the use of the devices as well as programmes and
apps.  I am all for practice to improve the use of a device, but what I am seeing more and more of is devices
being used to fill in time, manage time out or only used for apps.

Step 2 (So What):
An article written by David Neild (2015) for The Guardian asks the question: Is technology in the classroom
good for our children?  The article identifies the drop of maths results, handwriting ability and short attention
spans since the introduction of digital technology in the classroom.  I have seen this too with my own research
of introducing ChromeBooks in my classroom. Like I said before I’m a little old school, which I believe there is
nothing wrong with that, however, I also know the importance of allowing my learners to explore with
technology, for the world they are going to face when they leave school will be a digital one.  Slowly pen and
paper are becoming obsolete in the classrooms because ChromeBooks, laptops and computers are taking its
place. In this case the devices are not the problem, it’s the balance between handwriting (or print) and typing
and the importance of knowing how to do both, not one or the other.

Step 3 (Now What):
Everyone will have their own opinions of what is more useful to teach and learn.  Yes, we need to keep up
with the new trends that are happening outside and even inside our school walls, but we also must not lose
the skills that our learners must also have when technology cannot be used.  Face to face learning is just as
important where connections are still being made between learner and teacher, also between staff and not
just through email or text.
We know digital technology is quick and for some convenient but it might not be the most efficient way in
all communities.  Not only do we have to use digital technology in schools where children are finding the
balance between online and traditional work, we also have to create opportunities for whanau and family
to keep up with the changes of society.  

References

Daggett, B. (2014). Addressing Current and Future Challenges in Education. Retrieved from
http://www.leadered.com/pdf/2014MSC_AddressingCurrentandFutureChallenges.pdf

Eghan, A. (2016).  Bridge the word gap: speak 21,000 words to your preschooler daily. Retrieved from
https://www.greatschools.org/gk/articles/word-gap-speak-more-words-to-your-preschooler-daily/

Nield, D. (2015). Is technology in the classroom good for children? The Guardian. Retrieved from
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/dec/24/is-technology-in-the-classroom
-good-for-children

Ndou, D. (2016). Parents should prioritise digital skills for kids. The Herald.  Retrieved from
https://www.herald.co.zw/parents-should-prioritise-digital-skills-for-kids/

Rolfe, G., Freshwater, D., Jasper, M. (2001) Critical reflection in nursing and the helping professions: a user’s guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from https://my.cumbria.ac.uk/media/MyCumbria/Documents/ReflectiveModelRolfe.pdf

Tuesday, 13 November 2018

Week 29 - Using Social Online Networks in Teaching or Professional Development

Week 29 - Using Social Online Networks in Teaching or Professional Development

Jay and Johnson (2002) reflective model
Step 1 (Descriptive stage): Call me old school but I am slowly changing in order to use a more modern (social
media) style of teaching.  As we know the world is changing so fast around us and to prepare our learners for
the future, I have had to step out of my comfort zone and teach using unfamiliar tools.  My learners are using
google docs to type up their stories, record notes from inquiry and collaborate ideas with their peers. Google
docs allows my learners to share their work with me and I can even give feedback and feed-forward while
they are still working online.  My learners definitely like using google docs more than their book and pencil,
but if I was to reflect on the outcome of work that is produced, most of my learners struggle to produce
quality work on google docs. I cannot give my learners a new tool to use and expect them to know how to
use it.

Step 2 (Comparative stage): More and more classroom teachers are using Google docs in their classroom.  
When I shared my innovation to start using Google docs with an older class, colleagues in my Mindlab class
made comment that they were surprised we weren’t already using it, knowing that we had Chromebooks
in our classrooms.  
A recent teacher post by Keith Hamon, (January 25, 2017), talked about one of the advantages in using
Google Docs is its sharing feature. Students share their documents at the beginning of the writing process
so the teacher is able to follow all steps along the way.  Work is saved all the time even when changes are
made. Teachers have the access to see the changes which keeps them in the loop of their students learning.
For my students to be confident with using Google docs, I had to create and allow authentic opportunities
to take place in the classroom during their time on the devices.  This included typing programmes and
collaborate activities online.

Step 3 (critical reflection): Like everything, there are pros and cons.  Even though I personally don’t use
social media, my school was changing its use of social media and I had to keep up with it.  We first started
using Google docs for school planning, some teachers found the sharing of their work very hard, where
others found it useful and the collaborative opportunities were a bonus.
I don’t have the best programme in place for my students yet, in order to use Google docs, for I am still
learning myself the features of Google.  However, I believe starting our young learners to use google apps,
such as google docs, slides, blogger, drive, calendar and so forth will build their confidence as digital users
moving up in their school years.

References:

Anderson, M. (2013, September). Teacher Confidence In Using Technology. Retrieved from
https://ictevangelist.com/teacher-confidence-using-technology/

Hamon, K. (2017). Teaching Writing with Google Docs. Retrieved from
https://www.fractuslearning.com/teaching-writing-google-docs/

Jay, J.K. and Johnson, K.L. (2002). Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher
education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 73-85.

MoE. (2014). Leadership and the key competencies. Retrieved from
http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Key-competencies/To…

Walsh, K. (2010). Google Docs: Why Teachers and Students Should Be Using Them. Retrieved from
https://www.emergingedtech.com/2010/11/google-docs-why-teachers-and-students-should-be-using-
them-for-course-work/

Website: VLN - Virtual Learning Network

Wessling, S. (2012). Teaching Channel Getting Better Together - Google Docs in the Classroom. Retrieved from
https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/fostering-student-collaboration

YouTube Channel:  Google (August 5, 2008). Teachers and Principals talk about Google Docs. Retrieved from
http://www.crlt.umich.edu/olws/2/docs

Saturday, 10 November 2018

Week 28 - Legal and Ethical Contexts in my Digital Practice

Week 28 - Legal and Ethical Contexts in my Digital Practice




I will be using Rolfe et al (2001) framework on Reflective Practice to reflect on this weeks blog.


What?
My buddy class was connected to twitter and the teacher and students were always telling us how cool it
was to communicate with other classes around New Zealand.  My class were very keen to join in the
conversations and talk to other children around New Zealand especially their buddy class who were just
in the next room. After working out the programme with my colleague, I finally set up my class twitter
account.  Every Wednesday afternoon at 2:00pm, both our Year 5 and 6 classes went live on twitter.
The children were buzzing about receiving messages from other children and this was going well for
about a month. One Wednesday I received an urgent email from the twitter organisers showing me an
inappropriate message one of my students had posted.  During a live session, my student had posted a
message to another student in the buddy class, saying how beautiful he thought she was and asked if she
would like to be her girlfriend. The female student was very embarrassed by the message and got very upset.


So what?
My student had acted inappropriately on a medium that was very public and had made another student
embarrassed amongst their peers.  I had to really think about what the consequences was going to be for
my student, for I know his actions were inappropriate but was it that severe for punishment?  If this student
had done the same thing face to face with the female student, told her that she was beautiful and asked
if she could be his girlfriend, would the reactions of people be the same?  Yes, the girl would probably still
have been embarrassed but would the boy be facing consequences?
Because the incident took place on a public forum where hundreds of students would have been chatting
on a specific topic and the organisers blocked my student from posting (off topic).  A consequence had to
take place not only to explain to the child that his actions were not appropriate but to show an example
to all students that when posting online, that we had to always consider other people with what we type.


What now?
The debate had begun whether there was to be a consequence/punishment for what my student did
online. I believed there had to be where some of my other colleagues thought differently.  In the Code
of Professional Responsibility (June 2017) it gives reference that ‘teachers have a duty of care to ensure
that the physical and emotional wellbeing of learners is safeguarded.’  Another student was hurt due to
what was posted, to not do anything would imply that what my student did was okay by all.  I want our
students to take risks and be open, but I also want them to be responsible and understand the outcomes
of their choices.


References:


Ehrich, Lisa C., Kimber, Megan, Millwater, Jan & Cranston, Neil (2011). Ethical dilemma: a model to understand
teacher practice.  Teacher and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17 (2), pp. 173-185


Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
Correspondence: Sarup R. Mathur, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Tempe,
85287-1811 Arizona, USA. Tel: 1-480-965-6893. E-mail: sarup.mathur@asu.edu


Cranston, N., Ehrich, L. C. & Kimber, M. P. (2004). Towards an understanding of Ethical Dilemmas Faced by
School Leaders. Principia, Journal of the Queensland Secondary Principals' Association, 1, pp. 1-3